Wednesday, August 09, 2006

As promised....

The gist so far is:

Germany was devastated, France was devastated (1 in 4 men age 18-30 – Gone.) The Bigwigs are meeting in Paris – an unfortunate location because the French are so angry; they had hoped to meet in Geneva but after hearing that Switzerland was on the verge of revolution (Switzerland, really?) and that the whole place was swarming with German spies they had to give in to France’s pleas to have it in their capital city. Colonel Edward House (trusted advisor to President Woodrow Wilson) commented, “It will be difficult enough at best to make a just peace, and it will be almost impossible to do so while sitting in the atmosphere of a belligerent capital. It might turn out well and yet again it might be a tragedy.”
Commentary proceeds from here:

The Peace Conference of 1919 made Paris the capital of the World and involved, at its heart, three men of power, men as apt to human error as the citizens they represented. They came together in the midst of war-torn Europe with the large goal of peace and reconciliation, and the most noted result was the Treaty of
Versailles, signed in June 1919.

Mighty Europe has torn itself to shreds, predictably over a power squabble in the Balkans. The saying “Absolute power corrupts absolutely,” comes to mind – a commentary on the devastation inherent to desire for influence. The only countries that had managed to stay out of the war were Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Scandinavia. At the end of the war, Austria-Hungary, a larger country in the middle of Europe, had
disappeared. Left in her place was a small collection of newborn and reborn countries: Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia. As peacemakers met, new borders were being traced, dotted lines creating temporary entities, across these lands.

“Self-determination” was the watchword of the time– a phrase gleaned from the comments pouring from the White House. A idea thrown from behind a press conference throng of microphones, its impact was hard to crawl out from under. As Secretary of State Robert Lansing remarked, “When the President talks of ‘Self-determination,’ what unit has he in mind? Does he mean a race, a territorial area, or a community?...It will raise hopes which can never be realized. It will, I fear, cost thousands of lives. In the end it is bound to be discredited, to be called the dream of an idealist who failed to realize the danger until it was too late.” The phrases served as an inspiration to peoples all over the world – “Autonomous development”, “the right of those who submit to authority to have a voice in their own governments” – but the intention was vague. Did Wilson actually mean that any people who called themselves a nation should have their own state? The possible implications of such is an arresting thought.

From this we see the roots of modern problems:

Among them one would list:…the crisis over Iraq(whose present borders resulted from Franco-British rivalries and casual map-making); the continuing quest of the the Kurds for self-determination; disputes between Greece and Turkey; and the endless struggle between Arabs and Jews over land that each thought had been promised them.

And the immediate regret:

"I cannot say for how many years, perhaps I should say for how many centuries, the crisis that has begun will continue," predicted Georges Clemenceau, whose own behavior contributed to the failure. "Yes, this treaty will bring us burdens, troubles, miseries, difficulties, and that will continue for long years."



In Paris three men met, Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States of America, Georges Clemenceau, Prime Minister of France, and David Lloyd George, Prime Minister of Britain, assisted by their respective advisors, and in their hands they held the beginnings of a new world.

More to come later.

Friday, August 04, 2006

A plea to the Powers That Be

Oh, for the weekend.

Everyone has been way too needy this week.

Work and love life.
Friend life has been good.

but I'm drained for the weekdays - I need a beach day (don't know that thats going to happen either, but I'm holding my breath.)

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Yeah, So...

Since my track record indicates that I have failed miserably in the maintenance of this blog, especially, um, when it comes to you know, writing in it, and considering that I am now being threatened with judgement from on high:

A Legal Motion, on behalf of Dawn
From: Dawn
Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 3:55 PM
To: Felicity


Felicity -

According to said agreement of summer 2005, both
involved parties - Miss Felicity, Mrs. Dawn- were under obligation to
heretofor entertain former and latter parties with the details
of life's current ruminations on specified blogspot.com. Currently, you
have been found in a direct breach of this contract, and if not immediately
rectified, the situation may be taken to the Supreme Judge (God Almighty of
the Highest Heaven district). Please note that the consequences of your
actions affects Mrs. Dawn's emotional state and boredom levels, for
which she is currently under strict observation as she presents symptoms of
detrimentally high levels of both boredom and said unsteady mental fixations.
The Supreme Judge is partial to preserving her mental health, so please be aware
that He is fair, but sometimes harsh, in His penalties.

We thank you
in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Angel Right, of
Golden Gates Law and Order


I feel as though something must be done about this little endeavor of mine.

So this morning when I mentioned to Dawn about the new book I got, and that I bought it hoping (against my better judgement) that I would read it and to, um, make myself feel smarter by owning it (kinda like watching the West Wing) (maybe the knowledge would move from the bookshelf to my brain (diffusion maybe?) ) (how many parenthetical statements are allowed in a sentence?) - anyway, when I mentioned the book, she said "You should read it and write about it on your blog." And, due to the abovementioned threat, I feel that having something to keep up with on the blog would be a good thing, and also possibly a motivator to read the book, I think I may take her up on the idea. Question is: Do you also want commentary on the other book I'm reading, the O.S. Hawkins volume? You would initially say "No, Boring!" but it is actually quite stimulating and correct, and actually maybe more interesting than the meeting of the minds in Paris. Ah, we'll see how much commentary one blog can handle. Maybe this will also motivate me to read more at night when really all my brain has the energy to do is watch House or CSI on TV. Maybe.